Another site to consider as a WCAG 2.1 implementation

[Glenda Sims]

Andrew, Josh, Alastair,

I haven't had a chance to personally review this site, but I do want to
submit the winner of this year's OpenAIR 2018 competition for consideration
as a WCAG 2.1 implementation.

The team that built the American Council for the Blind, Nebraska site, "The
Inclusive Lab" is gung ho to be a WCAG 2.1 implementer. If someone has the
time to formally review the site for WCAG 2.1, I'm confident that Michael
Fairchild (the lead of the Inclusive Lab team) will be more than willing to
make sure that this site https://acbnebraska.org/ is a shining example of
WCAG 2.1.

Let me know if you this is a possibility...and I can share Michael
Fairchild's contact info with y'all.

Peace out,
G
*glenda sims* <***@deque.com>, cpacc
<http://www.accessibilityassociation.org/certification> | team a11y lead
| 512.963.3773

deque systems <http://www.deque.com> accessibility for good

[Alastair Campbell]

Hi Glenda,

I'm afraid the implementations are used specifically to progress to
candidate recommendation, and at this stage we don't have the capasity
to add & test another one.

What I would suggest is that someone who is confident with the new SCs
tackle it as a case study and publish the results as a blog post or
article.

From a very brief look it seems to be a great site, so should be an

easy test, and a useful case study.

Kind regards,

-Alastair

PS. Was this the email list you intended to send to?

Andrew, Josh, Alastair,
I haven't had a chance to personally review this site, but I do want to
submit the winner of this year's OpenAIR 2018 competition for consideration
as a WCAG 2.1 implementation.
The team that built the American Council for the Blind, Nebraska site, "The
Inclusive Lab" is gung ho to be a WCAG 2.1 implementer. If someone has the
time to formally review the site for WCAG 2.1, I'm confident that Michael
Fairchild (the lead of the Inclusive Lab team) will be more than willing to
make sure that this site https://acbnebraska.org/ is a shining example of
WCAG 2.1.
Let me know if you this is a possibility...and I can share Michael
Fairchild's contact info with y'all.
Peace out,
G
glenda sims, cpacc | team a11y lead | 512.963.3773
deque systems accessibility for good

[Mark Weiler]

Is there an existing set of implementations that are being reviewed? If so, where are they?
On Friday, May 25, 2018, 11:19:51 a.m. EDT, Alastair Campbell <***@gmail.com> wrote:

Hi Glenda,

I'm afraid the implementations are used specifically to progress to
candidate recommendation, and at this stage we don't have the capasity
to add & test another one.

What I would suggest is that someone who is confident with the new SCs
tackle it as a case study and publish the results as a blog post or
article.

From a very brief look it seems to be a great site, so should be an

easy test, and a useful case study.

Kind regards,

-Alastair

PS. Was this the email list you intended to send to?

Andrew, Josh, Alastair,
I haven't had a chance to personally review this site, but I do want to
submit the winner of this year's OpenAIR 2018 competition for consideration
as a WCAG 2.1 implementation.
The team that built the American Council for the Blind, Nebraska site, "The
Inclusive Lab" is gung ho to be a WCAG 2.1 implementer.  If someone has the
time to formally review the site for WCAG 2.1, I'm confident that Michael
Fairchild (the lead of the Inclusive Lab team) will be more than willing to
make sure that this site https://acbnebraska.org/ is a shining example of
WCAG 2.1.
Let me know if you this is a possibility...and I can share Michael
Fairchild's contact info with y'all.
Peace out,
G
glenda sims, cpacc  | team a11y lead | 512.963.3773
        deque systems  accessibility for good

[Beranek, Nicholas]

Hey Mark, since this is fresh in my mind as we are preparing for it here at Capital One, here is the WCAG 2.1 Implementation Report: https://www.w3.org/WAI/WCAG21/implementation-report/

Nick

From: Mark Weiler <***@alumni.sfu.ca>
Reply-To: Mark Weiler <***@alumni.sfu.ca>
Date: Friday, May 25, 2018 at 11:42 AM
To: "***@deque.com" <***@deque.com>, Alastair Campbell <***@gmail.com>
Cc: "w3c-wai-***@w3.org" <w3c-wai-***@w3.org>
Subject: Re: Another site to consider as a WCAG 2.1 implementation
Resent-From: "w3c-wai-***@w3.org" <w3c-wai-***@w3.org>
Resent-Date: Friday, May 25, 2018 at 11:30 AM

Is there an existing set of implementations that are being reviewed? If so, where are they?

On Friday, May 25, 2018, 11:19:51 a.m. EDT, Alastair Campbell <***@gmail.com> wrote:


Hi Glenda,

I'm afraid the implementations are used specifically to progress to
candidate recommendation, and at this stage we don't have the capasity
to add & test another one.

What I would suggest is that someone who is confident with the new SCs
tackle it as a case study and publish the results as a blog post or
article.

From a very brief look it seems to be a great site, so should be an

easy test, and a useful case study.

Kind regards,

-Alastair

PS. Was this the email list you intended to send to?

Andrew, Josh, Alastair,
I haven't had a chance to personally review this site, but I do want to
submit the winner of this year's OpenAIR 2018 competition for consideration
as a WCAG 2.1 implementation.
The team that built the American Council for the Blind, Nebraska site, "The
Inclusive Lab" is gung ho to be a WCAG 2.1 implementer. If someone has the
time to formally review the site for WCAG 2.1, I'm confident that Michael
Fairchild (the lead of the Inclusive Lab team) will be more than willing to
make sure that this site https://acbnebraska.org/ <https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__acbnebraska.org_&d=DwMFaQ&c=pLULRYW__RtkwsQUPxJVDGboCTdgji3AcHNJU0BpTJE&r=dC_UMEUmMt99VWyKrKPEqTxnbvpXlSbd6mQlzIdMbyICf0SCKN1_f4B400_d3Ziy&m=cvEnDezS0eW7dN_neoBmPdzeBvUE4CiwOcF4PiBd6Sw&s=TY2TugmYoLJN-2OTSFJ_KokWzAaJfJFJUUog3G5BRqg&e=> is a shining example of
WCAG 2.1.
Let me know if you this is a possibility...and I can share Michael
Fairchild's contact info with y'all.
Peace out,
G
glenda sims, cpacc | team a11y lead | 512.963.3773
deque systems accessibility for good

________________________________________________________

The information contained in this e-mail is confidential and/or proprietary to Capital One and/or its affiliates and may only be used solely in performance of work or services for Capital One. The information transmitted herewith is intended only for use by the individual or entity to which it is addressed. If the reader of this message is not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any review, retransmission, dissemination, distribution, copying or other use of, or taking of any action in reliance upon this information is strictly prohibited. If you have received this communication in error, please contact the sender and delete the material from your computer.

[Katie Haritos-Shea]

Great thought though Glenda!

** katie **

*Katie Haritos-Shea*

*Principal ICT Accessibility Architect, **W3C Advisory Committee Rep for
Knowbility *

*WCAG/Section 508/ADA/AODA/QA/FinServ/FinTech/Privacy,* *IAAP CPACC+WAS = *
*CPWA* <http://www.accessibilityassociation.org/cpwacertificants>

*Cell: **703-371-5545 <703-371-5545>** |* ****@gmail.com
<***@gmail.com>* *| **Oakton, VA **|* *LinkedIn Profile
<http://www.linkedin.com/in/katieharitosshea/>*

People may forget exactly what it was that you said or did,
but people will never forget how you made them feel.......

Our scars remind us of where we have been........they do not have to
dictate where we are going.


On Fri, May 25, 2018 at 11:55 AM, Beranek, Nicholas <

Post by Beranek, Nicholas
Hey Mark, since this is fresh in my mind as we are preparing for it here
https://www.w3.org/WAI/WCAG21/implementation-report/
Nick
*Date: *Friday, May 25, 2018 at 11:42 AM
*Subject: *Re: Another site to consider as a WCAG 2.1 implementation
*Resent-Date: *Friday, May 25, 2018 at 11:30 AM
Is there an existing set of implementations that are being reviewed? If so, where are they?
On Friday, May 25, 2018, 11:19:51 a.m. EDT, Alastair Campbell <
Hi Glenda,
I'm afraid the implementations are used specifically to progress to
candidate recommendation, and at this stage we don't have the capasity
to add & test another one.
What I would suggest is that someone who is confident with the new SCs
tackle it as a case study and publish the results as a blog post or
article.

From a very brief look it seems to be a great site, so should be an

easy test, and a useful case study.
Kind regards,
-Alastair
PS. Was this the email list you intended to send to?

Andrew, Josh, Alastair,
I haven't had a chance to personally review this site, but I do want to
submit the winner of this year's OpenAIR 2018 competition for

consideration

as a WCAG 2.1 implementation.
The team that built the American Council for the Blind, Nebraska site,

"The

Inclusive Lab" is gung ho to be a WCAG 2.1 implementer. If someone has

the

time to formally review the site for WCAG 2.1, I'm confident that Michael
Fairchild (the lead of the Inclusive Lab team) will be more than willing

to

make sure that this site https://acbnebraska.org/

<https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__acbnebraska.org_&d=DwMFaQ&c=pLULRYW__RtkwsQUPxJVDGboCTdgji3AcHNJU0BpTJE&r=dC_UMEUmMt99VWyKrKPEqTxnbvpXlSbd6mQlzIdMbyICf0SCKN1_f4B400_d3Ziy&m=cvEnDezS0eW7dN_neoBmPdzeBvUE4CiwOcF4PiBd6Sw&s=TY2TugmYoLJN-2OTSFJ_KokWzAaJfJFJUUog3G5BRqg&e=>is
a shining example of

WCAG 2.1.
Let me know if you this is a possibility...and I can share Michael
Fairchild's contact info with y'all.
Peace out,
G
glenda sims, cpacc | team a11y lead | 512.963.3773
deque systems accessibility for good

------------------------------
The information contained in this e-mail is confidential and/or
proprietary to Capital One and/or its affiliates and may only be used
solely in performance of work or services for Capital One. The information
transmitted herewith is intended only for use by the individual or entity
to which it is addressed. If the reader of this message is not the intended
recipient, you are hereby notified that any review, retransmission,
dissemination, distribution, copying or other use of, or taking of any
action in reliance upon this information is strictly prohibited. If you
have received this communication in error, please contact the sender and
delete the material from your computer.